Sign in
  • Home
  • About
  • Methodology
  • Meta-data and Definitions
  • Search the database
  • Explore research

SEARCH THE DATABASE

You can use AND, "+", OR, NOT and "-" as Boolean operators (please note: Boolean operators must be ALL CAPS).
The OR operator is the default conjunction operator for your search terms.
For your choice of AND or OR when using meta-data filtering, press the button below
OR AND
Show me all articles

Filter your search

Organizing Categories and Key Concepts(0)

Methods (0)

Disciplines (0)

Activities (0)

Physical Types (0)

Could not load search result, try reloading the page.
Found 2 match(es) for your search terms and/or filters.
shows 1 to 2
The Private Value of Public Open Space Within Subdivisions
Journal of Architectural and Planning Research (1993)
Peiser, Richard B., & Schwann, Gregory M.
Since the early 1900's when internal open spaces became common features of English new towns and American subdivisions patterned after Radburn, planners have assumed that internal parks are desirable features in subdivision planning. However, developers in the United States have in general failed to include open spaces within new subdivisions, thus raising questions about their real economic benefits. This paper examines those benefits within the context of a Radburn-style subdivision in Dallas. Using survey and sales data, the results indicate that homeowners value the open space - both those who live directly on the internal greenbelts and those who do not. However, where the open space causes a reduction in private backyard space, homeowners do not appear to value public open space as highly as private space.
View article
Do-It-Yourself Urban Design: The Social Practice of Informal “Improvement” Through Unauthorized Alteration
City & Community (2014)
Gordon C. C. Douglas
There are numerous ways in which people make illegal or unauthorized alterations to urban space. This study identifies and analyzes one that has been largely ignored in social science: explicitly functional and civic-minded informal contributions that I call “do-it-yourself urban design.” The research, which began as an investigation into more “traditional” nonpermissable alterations, uncovered these cases—from homemade bike lanes and street signs to guerrilla gardens and development proposals—that are gaining visibility in many cities, yet are poorly accounted for by existing perspectives in the literature. This article examines the existing theories and evidence from interviews and other fieldwork in 14 cities in order to develop the new analytical category of DIY urban design. I present findings on the creators of these interventions, on their motivations to “improve” the built environment where they perceive government and other development actors to be failing, and on the concentration of their efforts in gentrifying areas. This introduces the possibility of conflict and complicates their impact. I argue that DIY urban design has wide-ranging implications for both local communities and broader urban policy.
View article
  • 1
Export search results
© 2025 - TERRA PUBLICA
Get in touch Privacy Cookies